Legal Opinion

State v. Feinberg

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 11, 1910PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Polk District Gourt. — Hon. Jesse A. Miller, Judge. Dependant was indicted, tried, and convicted of the crime of receiving stolen property, and he appeals. The jury found the value of the property to be "more than $25.-

1Opinion of the CourtDeemer, C. J.

The stolen property consisted of certain furs or fur garments belonging to one J. A. Weber, and taken from his possession at the town of Neola in Pottawattamie County. According to the testimony, they were stolen by one James J. O’Brien, taken to Des Moines in Polk County, and there sold for a nominal sum to defendant, who was conducting a secondhand store in that city. The state relied almost entirely upon. the testimony of the confessed thief, and it is contended that, as he was uncorroborated in any essential particular, there should have been no conviction. Our statute defining the crime…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. HaydenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
  2. State v. JonesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
  3. State v. FredSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
  4. State v. ScottSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  5. Odell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1902

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. BoydSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922
  2. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1957
  3. State v. StrumSupreme Court of Iowa · 1918
  4. State v. RosenbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  5. State v. WenksSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API