Legal Opinion

State v. Ford

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided May 30, 1997No. 96-KP-2919PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Writ granted. The trial court may not avoid the procedural bars of La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8 by “reconsidering” an application for post-conviction relief on which it has earlier ruled, see La. C.Cr.P. art. 930.6; La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6 emt.; State v. Clayton, 96-1658 (La. 2/27/97), 687 So.2d 996; State ex rel. Lewis v. Cr.D.C., 571 So.2d 659 (La.1991), especially when, as here, this Court has considered and rejected the claims. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4(D); State v. Ford, 94-2883 (La. 2/3/95), 649 So.2d 404; State ex rel. Ford v. Blackburn, 513 So.2d 816 (La.1987). In any…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1985
  3. State v. MacKSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1981
  4. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  5. State ex rel. Lewis v. Criminal District CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Washington v. StateSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2017
  2. State v. FischerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1998
  3. State of Louisiana v. Sharon Leann JohnsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2024
  4. State v. DiazSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API