Legal Opinion · Dissent

Donohue v. Pioche Mines Co.

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1929No. 2849Published

1Dissent

The complaint is based upon the written contract set out in the opinion. By reference to the contract, it will be observed that defendant promised to deliver to plaintiff 900 shares of its capital stock, par value $5 per share, or, at the option of the defendant, to pay to the plaintiff the sum of $2,700 at the Bank of Pioche. The defendant did not choose to exercise its option. Therefore, its promise to deliver the stock became absolute regardless of its value. I do not conceive that the complaint is based upon a money demand. The prayer of a complaint is no part of the cause of action, and,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Clark v. ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Kingsbury v. CoprenNevada Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Sugarman Co. v. Morse Bros.Nevada Supreme Court · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API