Legal Opinion

Hewitt v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 27, 1913No. 2514PublishedCited by 7 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was indicted under the Act of 1911, page 29, prohibiting what is termed by the Act pandering.

It is unnecessary to notice any of the counts, there being nine contained in the indictment, except the ninth. This count alone was submitted by the court to the jury, all the others being expressly withdrawn in the charge. Omitting formal parts, this count charged that “J. R. Hewitt did by fraud and artifice and by duress of the person of Alma Johnson, a female, and by the abuse of his, the said J. R. Hewitt’s, position of confidence and authority with and over the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Haygood v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Hewitt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1914
  3. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1918
  4. State v. LeachCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
  5. Threlkeld v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API