Legal Opinion

Electric Paint & Varnish Co. v. Lunsford

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 20, 1938No. 26781PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMacIntyre, J.

This is the fourth appearance of this case in this court. On the first trial there was a verdict for the defendant, and the judgment refusing a new trial was reversed by this court (Electric Paint & Varnish Co. v. Lunsford, 46 Ga. App. 536, 168 S. E. 90), on the idea that the instrument sued on was a subsisting contract, and that it was not simply an offer to purchase made to a traveling salesman, which contract had been breached by the defendant by notice by him to the plaintiff not to ship the goods. On the second trial there was likewise a verdict for the defendant. This was appealed, and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Electric Paint & Varnish Co. v. LunsfordCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
  2. Lunsford v. Electric Paint & Varnish Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  3. Electric Paint & Varnish Co. v. LunsfordCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Williams v. American Surety CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
  2. Eidson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
  3. Williams v. American Surety CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API