Legal Opinion

In re Brooklyn Bar Ass'n

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 8, 1932Published

1Per curiam

The official referee, after a hearing, has made a report containing findings and the recommendation that the respondent be disbarred.

In the main, the charges are that since June, 1914, after having been reprimanded by this court for his practice in submitting and taxing an illegal and excessive bill of costs (See Matter of Zirinsky, 163 App. Div. 960), the respondent has continuously been engaged in similar practices under a different form, by purchasing tax liens, bringing purported foreclosure actions thereon and utilizing a fictitious and excessive bill of costs for purposes of oppression…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Moses v. . McDivittNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  2. In re FeinsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
  3. In re ZirinskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API