Legal Opinion
Kransteuber v. Scheyer
New York Court of Appeals
Decided June 4, 1992PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
This case involves petitioner-appellant’s application for area variances to allow construction of a single-family dwelling on a 5,000 square foot lot (50 by 100 feet) located in Oakdale, Town of Islip. Her husband purchased the property in 1934 and built a single-family dwelling on it. In 1942, petitioner acquired the property from her husband. The dwelling was destroyed eight years later due to termite damage, and the land remains vacant.
In 1937, the Town of Islip enacted its first comprehensive…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Honore de St. Aubin v. FlackeNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Spears v. BerleNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Town of Huntington v. Park Shore Country Day Camp of Dix Hills, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Kransteuber v. ScheyerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
3Cited by16 opinions
- Khan v. Zoning Board of AppealsNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Milburn Homes, Inc. v. TrottaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Linzenberg v. Town of RamapoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Allt v. Zoning Board of Appeals of Town of Hyde ParkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Clearwater Holding, Inc. v. Town of HempsteadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.