Legal Opinion
Timothy Rush v. James Smith, Silas Hardison, David Robbins, James Conway, Rita Krapf, Nesby Moore, Vincent Schoemehl
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided June 5, 1995No. 93-3585PublishedCited by 85 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*919McMILLIAN, Circuit Judge.
Timothy Rush appeals from a final order entered in the district court for the Eastern District of Missouri denying his post-trial motions for a new trial or default judgment in this civil rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. For reversal, Rush argues the trial judge erred in (1) dismissing the sole African-American juror, (2) making prejudicial comments to the jury, (3) denying his motions for new trial and default judgment based on defendants’ abuse of discovery, and (4) denying his motion for new trial based on the grounds that the verdict was against the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Starr v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Goldstein v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
- United States v. SingerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Hugh Trent BlandCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by85 opinions
- Schaub v. VonWaldCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- Burke v. RegaladoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- In Re the Celotex Corporation, Debtor. Owens-Illinois, Incorporated v. Rapid American Corporation, Successor in Interest to Philip-Carey CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
- Patricia Littrell, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Daniel Jake Franklin, in His Official and Individual Capacities, Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
- Vicki CROSS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Emanuel CLEAVER II, Et Al., Defendants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.