Lee v. State

ON appellant’s motion for rehearing.

HAWKINS, Judge. —

The officers testified to the movements of appellant’s car immediately prior to the search. It is not necessary to set out their, evidence in this regard. It is sufficient to say it did not show probable cause to authorize the search of the car, and if such cause did exist it was because of what appellant said to the officers — according to their testimony — immediately preceding the search.

The following statement in appellant’s motion for rehearing has challenged our attention: “We agree that the statements

sworn to by the officers…