Legal Opinion

Cohen & Malad, LLP v. John P. Daly, Jr., Golitko & Daly, P.C., and Golitko Legal Group, P.C.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 2015No. 29S02-1504-PL165Published

1Per curiam

The law firm Cohen & Malad, LLP (“C & M”), filed a quantum meruit claim for part of the contingent fees earned in cases that were handled first by C & M attorneys (including John P. Daly, Jr., when employed there as an associate) and later by Daly and his law firm after he left C & M. The trial court found that C & M attorneys — including Daly while employed there — worked a substantial number of hours on those cases and that most of those cases generated attorney fees. The court nevertheless denied C & M quantum meruit relief because it found Daly was not unjustly enriched where: (1) the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Galanis v. Lyons & TruittIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Cohen & Malad, LLP v. DalyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API