Thurmond v. Groves & Co.
Supreme Court of Georgia
Complaint. Before Judge Hardeman. City court of Washington. December term, 1905.
1Opinion of the CourtBumpkin, J.
1. This ease is controlled in principle by that of Dodson Printers’ Supply Co. v. Harris, 114 Ga. 966 (2), 968-9. While generally the rules of practice in the superior court are made applicable to the city court of Washington, except as in the act establishing that court provided, yet as to cases returnable to the monthly term of such, court the practice in the superior court in regard to appearance days, the allowance of thirty days in which to open defaults, and the discretionary power to do so thereafter, is not applicable. The first term is the trial term; and the presiding judge is not…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Dodson Printers Supply Co. v. HarrisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Norman & Harrell v. Great Western Tailoring Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Morgan v. PriorSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
3Cited by9 opinions
- Heitmann v. Commercial BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
- Florida Central Railroad v. LukeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
- Jenkins v. Whittier Mills Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
- Buford v. Southern Cotton Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
- Daniel v. Nixon & WrightCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.