Legal Opinion

Twitter, Inc. v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided August 30, 2021No. 3:20-cv-02397Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 TWITTER, INC., Case No. 20-CV-02397-LHK 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO 13 DISMISS v. 14 Re: Dkt. No. 75 VOIP-PAL.COM, INC., 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff Twitter, Inc. (“Twitter”) sues Defendant VoIP-Pal.com, Inc. (“Defendant”) for a 18 declaration of non-infringement and invalidity of

U.S. Patent No. 10,218,606

(“the ’606 patent”). 19 Before the Court is Defendant’s motion to dismiss Twitter’s complaint, ECF No. 62. Having 20 considered the parties’ submissions, the relevant law, and…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Safe Air for Everyone v. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  2. MedImmune, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Preiser v. NewkirkSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Douglas Leite v. Crane CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  5. Leadsinger, Inc. v. BMG Music PublishingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API