Legal Opinion

Demetrius Gohre v. Jared Hoy

District Court, W.D. Wisconsin

Decided January 9, 2026No. 3:24-cv-00448Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN DEMETRIUS GOHRE, Plaintiff, OPINION and ORDER v. 24-cv-448-jdp JARED HOY, Defendant. Plaintiff Demetrius Gohre, proceeding without counsel, alleges that he is receiving medications that contain pork byproduct, which has caused him to stop taking them to avoid violating his faith, Islam. Gohre is proceeding on religious liberty claims for injunctive and declaratory relief under the First Amendment’s Free Exercise Clause and the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA) against defendant Department of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Maddox v. LoveCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  2. Chicago United Industries, Ltd. v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
  3. Robert Brown v. Bartholomew Consolidated School CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
  4. Stevens v. HOUSING AUTHORITY OF SOUTH BENDDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API