Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Salvati v. American Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided April 26, 2017No. 16-1403PPublished

1ConcurrenceStahl, Circuit Judge

While I join this opinion, I write separately to express my concerns about its potential ramifications. It goes without saying that the typical consumer who purchases excess insurance expects that such insurance will protect him,or her in the event of a catastrophic accident where liability is relatively certain and where a potential judgment will likely exceed the primary coverage. Here, the Underlying Defendants, recognizing the extent'of Sal-vati’s claim, reasonably believed that their primary and excess insurance policies would protect them. Likewise, Salvati, having gained knowledge of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. SOLO CUP COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
  2. The Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania v. Lexington Insurance Company v. Affiliated Risk Control Administrators of Pennsylvania, Inc. And Insurance Company of North America, Aetna Insurance Company, Cigna Companies and Johnson & Higgins of Pennsylvania, Inc. And Alexander & Alexander, Inc. And Duane Morris & Heckscher, a Pennsylvania Partnership and McCabe James J. Esquire Individually and Medical Professional Liability Catastrophe Loss FundCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
  3. Gulezian v. Lincoln InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
  4. American Motorists Insurance v. Trane Co.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1982
  5. Campione v. WilsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API