Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Pray

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1936No. File No. 7853Published

1DissentRudolph, J.

Independent of the testimony of the alleged accomplices, Reaman and Grueber, the following facts are established by the testimony of other witnesses:

The defendant was seen in the company of Reaman in the immediate Vicinity of the place where the horses were kept a few days oefore the larceny occurred. (Testimony of Roy Castle.)

A few days after the larceny, the stolen horses were on the ranch belong to the defendant some 40 miles away from the place the larceny occurred. (Testimony of Ed Vaughn.)

When the stolen horses were brought to the ranch of the defendant, Reaman immediately got in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. DrapeauSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1922
  2. State v. HicksSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
  3. State v. WalshSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
  4. State v. KruseSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API