Legal Opinion

United States v. Kaufman & Vinson Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided November 10, 1959No. 4992Published

1Opinion of the CourtRich, Judge

This appeal is from the judgment of the United States Customs Court, Second Division, C.D. 2050, sustaining the protest of the importer to the classification of wire hoods for holding the corks in champagne bottles as articles in chief value of metal under paragraph 397, Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by GATT. The importer claims the correct classification is as “Bottle caps of metal” under paragraph 390.

The imported articles, called “muselets,” are twisted wire structures in common use to secure the corks or stoppers of champagne or sparkling wine bottles against blowing out under the gas…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Nevin v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
  2. Cribari v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1938
  3. Protest 107103-K of I. F. Schnier & Co.United States Customs Court · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API