Legal Opinion

Natavidad Duran Escobar v. Loretta E. Lynch

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 20, 2017No. 12-70930PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CHRISTEN, Circuit Judge:

This immigration case turns on whether California Penal Code section 136.1(a), California’s witness tampering statute, is a categorical crime involving moral turpitude. Petitioner Natividad De Jesus Duran Escobar (Duran) is a native and citizen of El Salvador, who fled to the United States after several encounters with guerrillas in the 1980s. An Immigration Judge (IJ) denied Duran’s application for cancellation of removal, concluding that she was ineligible because her conviction for witness tampering under section 136.1(a) was a categorical crime involving…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. Descamps v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. ORTEGA-LOPEZBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2018
  2. Miguel Orellana v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  3. Moises Ramirez-Contreras v. Jefferson SessionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  4. J-G-PBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2019
  5. Orlando Vasquez-Valle v. Jefferson Sessions, IIICourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API