In the Interest of M. V. H.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Blackburn, Presiding Judge.
M. V. H. was adjudicated delinquent after the juvenile court found he had committed an act which, had he been an adult, would *487have supported a conviction for aggravated assault,1 a designated felony.2 Following the denial of his motion for new trial, M. V. H. appeals, contending that the evidence was insufficient to support a conviction for aggravated assault and that the trial court erred in admitting irrelevant evidence. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.
1. “In considering a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence supporting an adjudication of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Ward v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
- In the Interest of T. T.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
- Terry v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
- Lattimer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Wilson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
- In the Interest of J. W. B.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
- In the Interest of K. C.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
- In the Interest of T. Y. B.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
- In Re JWBCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.