Samaritan Health Services v. Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System Administration
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EHRLICH, Acting Presiding Judge.
The issue presented by this appeal is whether the superior court correctly ruled that the Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System Administration (“AHCCCS”) and Arizona Physicians IPA, Inc. (“APIPA”) must pay Samaritan Health Services’ claim for emergency air transportation services provided to a patient who was a member of Arizona’s indigent health-care program. We affirm the court’s judgment for the reasons which follow.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Electing not to participate in the federal Medicaid program, the Arizona Legislature developed a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Havasu Heights Ranch & Development Corp. v. Desert Valley Wood Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
- Eshelman v. BlubaumCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
- Cochise County v. Arizona Health Care Cost Containment SystemCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
- Sanders v. NovickCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
3Cited by8 opinions
- Lathrop v. Arizona Board of Chiropractic ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
- Eaton v. Arizona Health Care Cost Containment SystemCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
- Hirsch v. Arizona Corp. CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
- St. Joseph's Hospital v. Arizona Health Care Cost Containment SystemCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
- State v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.