Legal Opinion
D'AMATO v. Astrue
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided March 12, 2008No. Civil Action 06-203-JJFPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
FARNAN, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is an appeal pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1383(c)(3), which incorporates 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), filed by Plaintiff, Amy D’Amato, seeking review of the final administrative decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (the “SSA”) denying her application for supplemental security income (“SSI”) under Title XVI of the Social Security Act. 42 U.S.C. §§ 1381 — 1383f. Plaintiff has filed a Motion For Summary Judgment requesting the Court to enter judgment in her favor, or in the alternative to remand this matter to…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Sims v. ApfelSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Daniel P. Cotter v. Patricia Roberts Harris, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Ethel Burnett v. Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Evelyn Plummer v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Brown v. Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2019