Campbell v. Johnson
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from Knox Circnit Court. — Hon. Charles D. Stewart, Judge. (1) The complaint follows substantially, the form No. 135, in the appendix of the Revised Statutes of 1899, and is the form which has been approved in this State for over fifty years by an unbroken line of decisions.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Knox Circnit Court. — Hon. Charles D. Stewart, Judge. (1) The complaint follows substantially, the form No. 135, in the appendix of the Revised Statutes of 1899, and is the form which has been approved in this State for over fifty years by an unbroken line of decisions. It contains every requirement of the statute for actions of unlawful detainer, as provided for in the first part of section 3321 of the Statutes of 1899. The rule of stare decisis is eminently applicable to this case. The following cases will be sufficient to illustrate the rule of practice in this State upon this…
1Opinion of the CourtBland, P. J.
The action is for unlawful detain-er. The complaint is as follows (omitting caption) :
“Lula M'. Campbell complains to Horace H. H. St. John, a justice of the peace within and for the county of Knox, and State of Missouri, that on the second day of March, 1906, she was the owner and had the legal right to the possession of the following described lands situate in the county of Knox and State of Missouri, to-wit: The east half of the northwest quarter of section eighteen (18), township sixty-two (62) north, range eleven (11) west, except thirty-eight and 87-100 acres off of the north end…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Witte v. QuinnMissouri Court of Appeals · 1890
- Young v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1859
- Alexander v. WestcottSupreme Court of Missouri · 1865
- Anderson v. McClureMissouri Court of Appeals · 1894
- Leahy v. LubmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1896
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ex Parte Dillon v. SmedleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1930