Legal Opinion

In re Klimow

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 26, 2002PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1966. He resides in California.

In December 1997, respondent pleaded guilty and was convicted in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona of violating 18 USC § 1001 (false statement), a felony offense. His federal conviction is essentially similar to an offense under Penal Law § 175.35, offering a false instrument for filing in the first degree, a class E felony (see Matter of Zumbo, 191 AD2d 805, lv denied 82 NY2d 653). We therefore grant petitioner’s motion for an order disbarring respondent and striking his name from…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re JohnstonNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. In re ZumboAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re SandersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  2. In re SandersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  3. MatterofSandersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API