Legal Opinion

Hiller v. Walter Ray & Co.

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 15, 1910PublishedCited by 12 opinions

This case ivas decided by Division A. Writ of error to the Circuit Court for Marion County. The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtWhitfield, C. J.

On September 27, 1901, Walter Ray and Daniel A. Clark, partners as Walter Eay & Company, referred to as lessors, entered into a contract with Herbert A. Ford and Edward Hiller, partners as Ford & Hiller, referred to as lessees, wherein it was agreed “that for and in consideration of the covenants and agreements herein contained, and the agreement to pay rent or royalties hereinafter referred to, the said lessors do hereby grant and lease unto the lessees all those certain” described lands containing 11,900 acres more or less “for the purposes only of digging, mining and preparing for shipment…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Ross v. SavageSupreme Court of Florida · 1913
  2. Stoddard v. Illinois Improvement & Ballast Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1916
  3. G.E.J. Corporation and M.F. Corporation v. Uranium Aire, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
  4. Paraffine Oil Co. v. CruceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  5. Virginia Iron, Coal & Coke Co. v. GrahamSupreme Court of Virginia · 1919

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API