Legal Opinion

Grob v. Metropolitan Collecting Agency

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1900PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Motion to vacate an attachment.

1Opinion of the CourtBeekman, J.

The plaintiff has obtained an attachment against the defendant, which is a foreign corporation, and a levy has been made under the writ upon certain property in this city belonging to the defendant. One Hiren G. McDowell, claiming to be a judgment creditor of the corporation, has caused an execution to be levied upon the same property and, as a junior lienor, now moves to vacate the attachment on the ground of the insufficiency of the papers on which it was granted. In order to maintain his motion “ he is bound to show that he has an outstanding lien ■which he could enforce against the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Turner v. . RobyNew York Court of Appeals · 1849
  2. Hamerschlag v. Cathoscope Electrical Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sill Stove Works v. ScottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API