Grob v. Metropolitan Collecting Agency
New York Supreme Court
Motion to vacate an attachment.
1Opinion of the CourtBeekman, J.
The plaintiff has obtained an attachment against the defendant, which is a foreign corporation, and a levy has been made under the writ upon certain property in this city belonging to the defendant. One Hiren G. McDowell, claiming to be a judgment creditor of the corporation, has caused an execution to be levied upon the same property and, as a junior lienor, now moves to vacate the attachment on the ground of the insufficiency of the papers on which it was granted. In order to maintain his motion “ he is bound to show that he has an outstanding lien ■which he could enforce against the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Turner v. . RobyNew York Court of Appeals · 1849
- Hamerschlag v. Cathoscope Electrical Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
3Cited by1 opinion
- Sill Stove Works v. ScottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901