Legal Opinion

People v. Goggans

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 1991PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Alan D. Marrus, J.

The defendant has made a motion pursuant to CPL 30.30 to *80dismiss his indictment for denial of a speedy trial. The bulk of the delay here has been caused by the codefendant’s claim of police brutality against the police officer who swore out the felony complaint and who is a material witness.

The chief issue is whether the period of time during which the People investigated this complaint of police brutality made by the codefendant constitutes excludable speedy trial time from the defendant’s case. Does this period of time constitute an exceptional…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. FluellenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  2. People v. ReganNew York Supreme Court · 1981
  3. People v. RoblesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Braune v. Abbott LaboratoriesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1995
  2. People v. HasslerCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1996
  3. People v. FloresNew York Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API