Legal Opinion

City of Pikeville v. Maynard

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided May 24, 1968PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLAY, Commissioner.

In this workmen’s compensation case the employee, a policeman, suffered physical injuries when attempting to make an arrest. They caused no appreciable disability, but as the result of a “conversion reaction” the Board found him totally disabled and made an award against the employer. The Special Fund was made a party, but nothing was adjudged against it. This award was confirmed by the circuit court and the employer appeals.

No question is raised with respect to the employee’s disability, and it is conceded to be psychiatric in nature. It is the employee’s position that his…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Holland v. Childers Coal CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1964
  2. Cabe v. Olin Mathieson Chemical Corp.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1967
  3. E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Co. v. WhitsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1966

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Yocom v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1977
  2. Young v. Bear Branch Coal CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1968
  3. Commonwealth, Department of Economic Security v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1969
  4. Yocom v. Tri-County Sanitation Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1975
  5. Young v. MullinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API