Friends of Fiery Gizzard v. Farmers Home Administration
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DAVID A. NELSON, Circuit Judge.
Where a detailed “environmental assessment” prepared by the Farmers Home Administration concludes that a water impoundment and treatment project to be funded by the agency will have no significant adverse effects on the human environment, does the fact that people served by the project will enjoy the benefit of an improved water sup*503ply mean that the agency must prepare a full-scale environmental impact statement that would not otherwise be required? Answering this question in the negative, the district court denied an application for a preliminary injunction…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Kleppe v. Sierra ClubSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Andrus v. Sierra ClubSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Metropolitan Edison Co. v. People Against Nuclear EnergySupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- William Cronin v. United States Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Buckeye Forest Council v. United States Forest ServiceDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2005
- Friends Of Fiery Gizzard v. Farmers Home AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995