Legal Opinion
French v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided November 22, 2002No. 03S00-9911-CR-661Published
1Opinion of the Court
778 N.E.2d 816 (2002)
Roman Lamont FRENCH, Appellant (Defendant Below),
v.
STATE of Indiana, Appellee (Plaintiff Below).
No. 03S00-9911-CR-661.
Supreme Court of Indiana.
November 22, 2002.
Kay A. Beehler, Indianapolis, IN, Attorney for Appellant.
Steve Carter, Attorney General of Indiana, Arthur Thaddeus Perry, Deputy Attorney General, Indianapolis, IN, Attorneys for Appellee.
BOEHM, Justice.
In this consolidated appeal, Roman Lamont French challenges both his conviction for cocaine dealing and the denial of post-conviction relief. We hold: (1) French was not denied due process when he appeared,…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Concurrence.
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Estelle v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Turner v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Tony Duckett v. Salvador Godinez Brian McKayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.