Legal Opinion

Redfield v. Critchley

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1939PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLauer, J.

I am now asked to amend the judgment heretofore entered herein by correcting what is claimed to have been a mistake in the calculation of interest in the original judgment. The original judgment was entered after a trial had before me and pursuant to findings. From that judgment an appeal was taken to the Appellate Division and to the Court of Appeals and the judgment in each instance was affirmed. (Redfield v. Critchley, 252 App. Div. 568; affd., 277 N. Y. 336.) It appears that it was claimed by the plaintiffs-appellants and defendants-appellants, who now make this application, both in the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Herpe v. . HerpeNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. Redfield v. CritchleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  3. Kirkpatrick Home for Childless Women v. KenyonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
  4. Redfield v. CritchleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
  5. Sheldon v. WilliamsNew York Supreme Court · 1866

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Estate of BalfeNew York Surrogate's Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API