Nelson v. Kalkhoff
Supreme Court of Minnesota
From an order of the district court for Hennepin county, Russell, J.,-directing the receiver of James H. Bishop & Company to pay defendants as rent the sum of $1,200, defendants appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.
The facts in this case, down to the time the receiver of James H. Bishop & Company was appointed, we stated in the case of Kalkhoff v. Nelson, supra, p. 284, 62 N. W. 332. The respondent, as such receiver, under the order of the court appointing him, entered into the demised premises, for the purpose of selling the stock of merchandise in the building thereon, on February 7, 1894, and continued in possession thereof for such purpose until June 5, 1894, when he vacated them, and refused to accept the lease. He took such possession without any agreement or consent of the appellants, except as…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Forepaugh v. WestfallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
3Cited by5 opinions
- Peabody Coal Co. v. NixonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915
- Citizens Savings & Trust Co. v. RogersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916
- Perrin & Smith Printing Co. v. Cook Hotel & Excursion Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1906
- Fitterling v. WelchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
- Conover v. Sterling Stores Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1923