Legal Opinion · Dissent

Cessna Finance Corp. v. Design Engineering & Construction International Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 4, 1985No. 70443Published

1DissentDeen, Presiding Judge

As noted by the majority opinion, OCGA § 11-9-504 (3) requires that the disposition of repossessed collateral be commercially reasonable. The purpose of the “reasonable notification” requirement of *209OCGA § 11-9-504 (3) is to afford a debtor the opportunity to protect his interests at the sale (by challenging aspects of the sale or seeking out potential buyers) or to redeem the collateral prior to any sale. Barbree v. Allis-Chalmers Corp., 250 Ga. 409 (297 SE2d 465) (1982); Geoghagan v. Commercial Credit Corp., 130 Ga. App. 828 (204 SE2d 784) (1974). Providing the debtor with reasonable…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Farmers Bank v. HubbardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
  2. Barbree v. Allis-Chalmers Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1982
  3. Geoghagan v. Commercial Credit Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  4. Cook v. First National Bank of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  5. Doyal Development Co. v. BlairCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API