Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Hogan

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 5, 1978No. 336PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NIX, Justice.

The pivotal question presented in this appeal is whether the Double Jeopardy Clauses of the United States and Pennsylvania Constitutions would be violated by a retrial of appellant under an indictment where two previously com*335pleted trials had resulted in the award of new trials at appellant’s request.

Appellant, Anthony Hogan, was arrested for the slaying of a police officer on November 20, 1971. Appellant was thereafter convicted of first degree murder in two jury trials and on each occasion was awarded a new trial by the court en banc. Prior to the commencement of the…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. State v. WatkinsTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Rivenbark v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Commonwealth v. BradySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Commonwealth v. VogelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Commonwealth v. KlobuchirSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API