Legal Opinion

State Farm Lloyds v. Hamilton

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided August 29, 2008No. 05-06-01032-CVPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

Justice FITZGERALD.

State Farm Lloyds appeals the trial court’s judgment in favor of its insureds, Terry and Johnnie Hamilton. In four issues State Farm challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the jury’s findings of breach of contract, cost of repair damages, extracontractual violations, and mental anguish damages. We conclude sufficient evidence supports each of these findings, and we affirm the tidal court’s judgment.

Background

Cases such as this one — involving claims by homeowners against insurers and alleging incorrect coverage decisions and bad-faith conduct…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  2. General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Cain v. BainTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  4. EI Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. RobinsonTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Transportation Insurance Co. v. MorielTexas Supreme Court · 1994

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Geis v. Colina Del Rio, LP, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2011
  2. Southland Lloyds Insurance Company v. David Onofre Cantu and Guadalupe Cantu, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2011
  3. Chubb Lloyds Insurance Co. of Texas v. Andrew's Restoration, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2010
  4. Dora Gulley v. State Farm Lloyds, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2014
  5. Thompson v. Zurich American InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API