Legal Opinion · Dissent

Wersal v. Sexton

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided July 29, 2010No. 09-1578Published

1DissentBye, Circuit Judge

I respectfully dissent. The Court today invalidates provisions of the Minnesota Code of Judicial Conduct prohibiting judicial candidates, including sitting judges, from publicly endorsing other candidates for public office and personally soliciting campaign contributions. Broadly speaking, the Court makes two fundamental errors in its analysis. First, the majority consistently undervalues Minnesota’s compelling interest in promoting impartiality and the appearance of impartiality in the Minnesota judicial system. Second, the majority misapprehends the extent to which the provisions of the…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  4. Citizens United v. Federal Election CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. Edward J. DeBartolo Corp. v. Florida Gulf Coast Building & Construction Trades CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API