Legal Opinion

Almond v. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 5, 1982No. 63200PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Deen, Presiding Judge.

This is an appeal from a jury verdict in an eminent domain case.

1. The appellant excepts to the first sentence of the following excerpt from the charge: “I charge you that replacement value is nota proper standard for the measure of damages in a condemnation action unless you find that the property is so unique that it cannot be valued by any other method. I further charge you that the replacement cost of any improvements may not be considered without taking into consideration the depreciation. Depreciation must necessarily be considered when the property and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Housing Authority v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  2. Department of Transportation v. DentCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  3. HOUSING &C. CITY OF ATLANTA v. TroncalliCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  4. State Highway Department v. MurrayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
  5. Zeeman Manufacturing Co. v. L. R. Sams Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1970

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Department of Transportation v. 2.734 Acres of LandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  2. Raiford v. Deparment of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
  3. Jotin Realty Co. v. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  4. Taylor v. Jones CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
  5. Department of Transportation v. IntoCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API