Legal Opinion

Portland Natural Gas v. Martin, et al

District Court, D. New Hampshire

Decided November 3, 1998No. CV-98-436-JMPublished

1Opinion of the Court

Portland Natural Gas v . Martin, et al CV-98-436-JM 11/03/98 P UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Portland Natural Gas Transmission System v. Civil N o . 98-436-JM 4.83 Acres of Land, et a l . O R D E R Before me in this condemnation action under the Natural Gas Act, 15 U.S.C. § 717f(h), are the following motions filed by defendant Frederick W . Martin: a motion for a 90-day letter (document n o . 9 ) ; a motion for relief (document n o . 7 ) , a motion to dismiss under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3) (document n o . 2 0 ) ; and a motion for a preliminary injunction, entitled…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Weinberger v. Romero-BarceloSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Narragansett Indian Tribe v. Paul E. GuilbertCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
  3. United States v. Nippon Paper Industries Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
  4. Bettman v. HarnessWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Manuel Lafont-Rivera v. Jose Soler-Zapata, Ricardo Torres Munoz, Armando TrocheCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API