Legal Opinion

Moore v. Proper

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 6, 2011No. COA10-1475PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUNTER, JR., Robert N., Judge.

*203I. Factual and Procedural History

Janet E. Moore (“Plaintiff’) sought treatment for a toothache on 16 January 2006 and was treated by Dr. Proper, a dentist in Dr. Shaun O’Heam’s office. On 12 January 2009, Plaintiff’s counsel filed a motion and obtained an order from the court pursuant to Rule 9(j) extending the statute of limitations in a medical malpractice action to 16 May 2009 to seek an appropriate expert witness. Plaintiff’s 5 March 2009 Complaint alleges Dr. Proper fractured her jaw while extracting a tooth, and thereafter discharged her without notifying…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Barringer v. FORSYTH COUNTY WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY BAPTIST MEDICAL CTRCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  2. Coffman v. RobersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  3. Trapp v. MacCioliCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  4. Diggs v. Novant Health, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  5. Cornett v. Watauga Surgical Group, P.A.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Moore v. ProperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2012
  2. In re MurdockCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  3. Moore v. ProperCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  4. Moore v. ProperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API