Legal Opinion
Lugo v. Farmer's Pride Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided August 25, 2010No. Civil Action 07-0749PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM RE: DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DECERTIFY
BAYLSON, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Before the Court is defendant Farmers Pride, Inc.’s Motion to Decertify the Collective Action Class. (Doc. 432.) Plaintiffs, current and former employees of defendant, have brought suit under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) on behalf of themselves and others “similarly situated,” as provided for in 29 U.S.C. § 216(b). Plaintiffs allege that defendant has failed to fully compensate them for the time spent putting on and taking off (“donning and doffing”) items of sanitary and protective clothing and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- In Re Hydrogen Peroxide Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Grayson v. K Mart Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
- De Asencio v. Tyson Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- Lessie Anderson v. Cagle's, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Zivali v. AT & T MOBILITY, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Andrako v. United States Steel Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
- Garcia v. Tyson Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- Garcia v. Tyson Foods, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2012
- Morangelli v. Chemed Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2013
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.