Legal Opinion

Dogan v. Georgia Department of Human Resources

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 14, 2006No. A06A0585PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ruffin, Chief Judge.

The trial court held Walter Dogan in contempt for falsifying documentation he submitted to the court in connection with a child support petition. Dogan appeals the contempt order, asserting that the trial court erred in finding him in contempt. In the alternative, Dogan argues that the judge was required to recuse himself. Finding no error, we affirm.

1. On appeal from a conviction for criminal contempt, we view the evidence in a light favorable to the trial court’s ruling.1 So viewed, the record reveals that the Georgia Department of Human Resources (“DHR”) brought a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ramirez v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2005
  2. In Re SpruellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  3. In Re AdamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  4. In Re BrantCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  5. In Re SchoolcraftCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In the Matter of DoganSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007
  2. In re DillonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2017
  3. In Re Trace DillonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API