Legal Opinion
Eiseler v. Barnhart
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided September 30, 2004No. Civil 03-73557PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
FEIKENS, District Judge.
The Court having reviewed the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, filed on August 16, 2004, and noted that no objections were filed by either party,
IT IS ORDERED that the Report is accepted and entered as the findings and conclusions of this court.
Report and Recommendation
PEPE, United States Magistrate Judge.
I. Background
Susan Eiseler brought this action under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) to challenge a final decision of the Commissioner denying her application for Disability Insurance Benefits under Title II…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Luther D. Mullen v. Otis Bowen, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Richard G. Shepherd v. Otis Bowen, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- Janet L. FAUCHER, Plaintiff-Appellee, Ronald L. Faucher, Plaintiff, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Stevens v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2007