Legal Opinion

Salisbury v. Miller

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 1866PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal in Chancery from Washtenaw Circuit. This was a bill to restrain defendant Miller from asserting title to certain lands occupied by complainant, — which he also claimed to own. The facts are fully stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Campbell J.

This was a bill filed to restrain defendant Miller from asserting title to certain lands .occupied by complainant, *161which he claimed also to own. The bill sets up that complainant purchased the property by contract from Martin Doty, and obtained a conveyance from Chauncey Joslin, who had become owner thereof subject to complainant’s rights, and to whom complainant made the payments not made to Doty. That, by a mistake of the conveyancer, the land was mis-described in both the contract and the deed. That before receiving the deed complainant began to improve the property, and during…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. King v. CarpenterMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Ormsby v. BarrMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
  3. Casserly v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Hilton v. SloanUtah Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Cleland v. CasgrainMichigan Supreme Court · 1892

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API