Salisbury v. Miller
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal in Chancery from Washtenaw Circuit. This was a bill to restrain defendant Miller from asserting title to certain lands occupied by complainant, — which he also claimed to own. The facts are fully stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Campbell J.
This was a bill filed to restrain defendant Miller from asserting title to certain lands .occupied by complainant, *161which he claimed also to own. The bill sets up that complainant purchased the property by contract from Martin Doty, and obtained a conveyance from Chauncey Joslin, who had become owner thereof subject to complainant’s rights, and to whom complainant made the payments not made to Doty. That, by a mistake of the conveyancer, the land was mis-described in both the contract and the deed. That before receiving the deed complainant began to improve the property, and during…
2Cited by6 opinions
- King v. CarpenterMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
- Ormsby v. BarrMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
- Casserly v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
- Hilton v. SloanUtah Supreme Court · 1910
- Cleland v. CasgrainMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.