Legal Opinion
Jones v. Piper Aircraft Corp.
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided August 16, 1955No. Civ. A. No. 4073PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURPHY, Chief Judge.
For reasons assigned in our opinion in Smith v. Piper Aircraft Corporation, 18 F.R.D. 169, filed this date, plaintiff may amend her complaint; the motion to strike affirmative defenses is denied; answers to interrogatories should be reexamined before sanctions under rule 37 (a), Fed.Rules Civ.Proc., 28 U.S.C., are appropriate.
*182In addition to the claim against defendant, plaintiff seeks to recover in an Alabama state court from Smith Way Inc. and the pilot’s estate, alleging that the pilot’s negligence was the proximate cause of the accident.
Under Rule 36 defendant sets…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Lámar v. MicouSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Rollestone v. Cassirer & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Moran v. Pittsburgh-Des Moines Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. DanielsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Giannone v. United States Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
- Smith v. Piper Aircraft Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1955
- David v. Broadway Maintenance Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
- Linde v. KilbourneMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
- Samuel Giannone v. United States Steel Corporation (Defendant) and Philadelphia Electric Company (Third-Party Defendant). Grace Mallace, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Vincent Mallace, Deceased v. United States Steel Corporation (Defendant) and Philadelphia Electric Company (Third-Party Defendant)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.