Legal Opinion
Langler v. County of Cayuga
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 30, 2009PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1776Judicial review of an administrative determination following a hearing required by law is limited to whether the determination is supported by substantial evidence (see CPLR 7803 [4]; Matter of Guerrero v Scoppetta, 53 AD3d 615 [2008]; Matter of D’Alessandro v West Hempstead Fire Dist., 53 AD3d 576, 577 [2008]). Substantial evidence “means such relevant proof as a reasonable mind may accept as adequate to support a conclusion or ultimate fact” (300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176, 180 [1978]; see Matter of Lundy v City of Oswego, 59 AD3d 954 [2009]). Here, we…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- 300 Gramatan Avenue Associates v. State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Barhite v. Village of MedinaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Lundy v. City of OswegoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- D'Alessandro v. West Hempstead Fire DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Guerrero v. ScoppettaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
3Cited by11 opinions
- De Guzman v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Guynup v. County of ClintonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Johnson v. Town of AmherstAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Rodriguez v. County of AlbanyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Ophardt v. VasquezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.