Legal Opinion · Dissent

Holiday Hospitality Franchising, Inc. v. Amco Insurance Company

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 2013No. 33S01-1206-CT-312Published

1DissentRucker, J.

The Court of Appeals concluded there is a genuine issue of material fact as to whether R.M.H. was “in the care, custody or control” of Holiday Inn Express. Holiday Hospitality Franchising, Inc. v. Amco Ins. Co., 955 N.E.2d 827, 836 (Ind.Ct.App.2011). At least with respect to “care” and “control” I agree with the court’s conclusion and would thus deny summary judgment in favor of AMCO on this issue. Therefore I respectfully dissent.

I agree with the majority that R.M.H. was not in the “custody” of Holiday Inn Express. And I also agree that “to some extent” R.M.H. was under Holiday Inn Express’…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Holiday Hospitality Franchising, Inc. v. Amco Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API