Legal Opinion

Atwater v. Hannah & Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided December 12, 1902PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Complaint for damages. Before' Judge Roberts. Upson superior court. January 16, 1902.

1Opinion of the CourtCobb, J.

Atwater sued Hannah & Company, alleging in his petition, in substance, that the defendants were warehousemen and as such had received for plaintiff six bales of cotton, which they undertook, for a consideration, to safely keep and to deliver upon demand, but which they had faded to do, thereby becoming liable to plaintiff in a stated sum. It was further alleged that defendants, in order to induce custom, had inserted in the warehouse receipts the following: “ All cotton stored with us fully insured. Acts of Providence excepted.” It was averred that this statement was in the receipts given to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Zorn v. Hannah & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1898

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Farmers Ginnery & Manufacturing Co. v. ThrasherSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
  2. Crider v. HeddenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
  3. Moreland v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  4. Rochelle Gin & Cotton Co. v. FisherCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
  5. Kleckley v. Bank of OglethorpeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API