Legal Opinion

Parr v. Chittim

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided June 22, 1921No. 247-3446PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Error to Court of Civil Appeals of Fourth Supreme Judicial District. Action by Annie E. Chittim against G. A. Parr and others. To review a judgment for defendants, plaintiff brought error to the Court of Civil Appeals, which reversed and rendered judgment dismissing the cause for want of prosecution (216 S. W. 63S), and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtPoweld, J.

On December 8, 1905, in the district court of Bexar county, Tex., the estate of J. M. Chittim recovered judgment against A. Parr for $60,115.30, with interest from the date thereof at the rate of 6 per cent, per annum and all costs of court. Said judgment was kept alive by issuance of various executions from time to time, which were returned “nulla bona.” An abstract of said judgment was duly recorded in the office of the county clerk of Duval county, Tex., on December 18, 1905, and March 3, 1916. The filing, recording, and indexing of said judgment became a lien on such real estate as A.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Harris v. SchlinkeTexas Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Burger v. YoungTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Browning v. PumphreyTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Chittim v. ParrCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Freeman v. FreemanTexas Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Ware v. JonesTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
  3. Farmers' Gas Co. v. CalameCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  4. Security State Bank v. MerrittCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  5. Scarborough v. BradleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API