Poston Steel Erection v. Saumenig

Poston Steel filed a complaint to foreclose a mechanic’s lien for money allegedly due for work and services performed. Poston claimed that the money was due for hauling and erecting certain precast concrete beams in connection with the construction of a building for appellees Sau-menig and Moorefield. Appellee Hutchinson, the other defendant below, was the general contractor for the construction of the building.

*311By the contract, the appellant Poston agreed to transport nine of the beams from the manufacturer’s premises and install them at appellees’ job site. The beams were 112 feet long, 4…