Alderman v. Martinson (In Re Alderman)
United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit
1Dissent
*112HIGDON, Bankruptcy Judge,
dissenting:
I dissent because I believe that the bankruptcy court entered an order during the Chapter 13 proceeding which, upon conversion of the case to Chapter 7, was res judica-ta as to the matter of the value of the debtors’ homestead exemption in the Chapter 7.
At the time the debtors filed their Chapter 13 petition they claimed a homestead exemption in the partnership property in which Mr. Alderman owned an interest.2 They claimed the value of the exemption as the “maximum allowed” on their Schedule B^f. The Chapter 13 trustee did not object to this exemption…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Katchen v. LandySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Lawlor v. National Screen Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- In Re Irwin Hyman Janice Hyman, Debtors. Irwin Hyman Janice Hyman v. Gary A. Plotkin, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Magallanes v. Williams (In Re Magallanes)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.