Legal Opinion
Shearn v. Lord
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 13, 1956PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJacob Markowitz, J.
This is a motion "by defendants, Kerrigan and Clarence J. Shearn, Jr., for an order pursuant to section 190-a of the Civil Practice Act removing this action to the Surrogate’s Court of "Westchester County for trial. The action was brought by plaintiff under article 15 of the Real Property Law to determine her claim to the sole ownership of a certain piece of real property located in Manhattan at 13 East 69th Street. The record owner of the property in question is Clarence J. Shearn, plaintiff’s husband, now deceased, and whose estate is being administered in Westchester County, of which…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Matter of LyonNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
- In re the Estate of PothNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935
- In re the Estate of KatzNew York Surrogate's Court · 1947
3Cited by7 opinions
- Burmax Co. v. B & S Industries, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Nichols v. KrugerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Garland v. RaunheimAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
- Collins v. Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co.New York Supreme Court · 1984
- In re the Estate of FornasonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.