Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Bank & Trust Co. v. Prestridge

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided October 11, 1989No. CA 88 1042PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALFORD, Judge.

The defendant, Richard Donald Pres-tridge, appeals the trial court’s judgment in favor of the plaintiff, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) whereby the court granted the summary judgment as prayed for, finding against Prestridge for the principal amount of $2,400,000.00 due on the promissory note plus interest, attorney’s fees and court costs. The judgment also recognized and maintained the pledge of the Ne Varietur Note and the Collateral Mortgage held by the FDIC on Prestridge’s property.

BACKGROUND

The facts are shown by the pleadings, answers to interrogatories,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Langley v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Albuquerque Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. DevilleLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1993
  2. Cadle Co. v. JohnsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1998
  3. Ascani v. AscaniLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
  4. Metropolitan Bank & Trust Co. v. PrestridgeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API